EU Pure Ban - Dallas

[Shrewd]

 

Offender: Dallas     Battlemetrics | Steam
Server: EU Pure
Time: 05/07/25 11:36:54
Expires: Permanent until appealed.
Reason: griefing
More Info:

The player made a trap base and killed one of the players. 
The player has already 2 warnings. Since it has been 3 violations of our server's rules in a short period of time, it seems the player is not willing to abide by those rules, so the ban was issued upon that.

[Dallas]

I'd like to know specificly why i was banned since it says "griefing" as the reason but i didn't toke anything from anyone nor trespassed any player preperty. 

EDIT: My base was not a trap base, it did have shotguns in one of the entrances wich had a NO TRESPASSING sign. Whoever got killed by that was the real grieffer. Also the previous warnings were respected and were for actions that did not harm other players in anyway, such as puting a ladder on a base to recover my backpack from it's roof, or put c4 in a community base in last day of wipe, c4 that of course did no harm to it. I was also heavily insulted by a very toxic player wich i reported and this admin just didn't care. I have no appologies to make, this is just incompetence.

Edited July 5 by Dallas

[Shrewd]

Hello, 

Your actions on the server in a short period of time led to 2 warnings then this ban.

1. Placing a ladder on a base is obviously called base raiding. (Warning)

2. Entering bases and checking boxes is also another rule breaking. (Warning)

3. Trap bases are not allowed whatsoever on the server. Instead of putting "No trespassing" you could just close the door. That is called griefing. (Ban)

Your ban remains. I would suggest you reflect on the things you have done instead of calling what we do as "incompetence".

 

[Dallas]

As i said the 2 previous warnings were respected. But a ban for leaving the door open? Nah, i'm not even arguing on that, and i have nothing to reflect on.  You do.

 

Edited July 6 by Dallas

[Shrewd]

Hello again,

I’ll keep this short since there’s clearly no intention on your end to take accountability.

Warnings are not trophies to be “respected". They’re signs of repeated misconduct. Continuing to argue semantics after three separate violations only confirms that the ban was necessary.

This is not about an open door. It’s about the trap base setup that broke a clearly stated rule.

If you choose not to reflect, that’s your decision. But projecting responsibility back onto the admin team only reinforces the very behavior that led to this outcome.

No further responses will be made on this matter.

Best of luck,

Shrewd

[Dallas]

I took accountability for the 2 previous warnings, that's what i meant by "respected" (you are actually the one going into semantics here) but as i said, i'm not even arguing on this one. A grieffer was caught and i was banned, as simple as that. Bye

Edited July 6 by Dallas