Mitsung

I want to address the issue regarding the fuel taken from the eight Mini Copters that were parked at the Oil Rig. Yes, I acknowledge that I took fuel from those eight Mini Copters, approximately 250–300 low-grade fuel in total. I admitted this myself and accepted the first warning you gave me. I am not denying what I did, nor am I trying to avoid responsibility for my actions. However, I want to clarify that I did not take the fuel with the intention of stealing from another player. There were eight Mini Copters left parked there, and I genuinely believed they had been abandoned. Something I would like you to consider is that I admitted taking the fuel myself before anyone confronted me or caught me doing it. I was honest about what I had done from the beginning, and I accepted the warning without arguing against it. Throughout my entire time playing on the AU server, I have never had a history of taking other players' belongings. This incident was the first time I had taken something like this. I have always been careful about respecting other players' property, even when it comes to something as small as loot from a dead player's body bag. I usually ask in world chat before touching anything that might belong to someone else. I understand that taking the fuel was a mistake, and I accept that I should have been more careful instead of assuming the Mini Copters had been abandoned. However, I genuinely hope this one incident does not define my entire history on the server. Regarding the C4 and the Chinook, I would also like to clarify something. I was repeatedly telling Tac that we needed 10 C4 to take down the Chinook. I would appreciate it if you could review the complete conversation between us, starting from before we even headed to the Oil Rig. I had already discussed the plan with Tac beforehand, including the fact that we needed 10 C4. I also told him that we should test the RF first to make sure everything was working properly so that we wouldn't miss or waste the C4. My question is: why are only parts of the conversation being shown instead of the complete discussion? If the chat logs are being used as evidence, I kindly request that the full conversation be reviewed, including everything we discussed before leaving for the Oil Rig. Showing only selected parts of the conversation without the earlier context could give a completely different impression of what actually happened. I'm not asking for anything to be hidden or ignored. I simply want the complete context to be considered so that the situation can be judged fairly. I'm not trying to justify my mistake. I'm simply asking you to consider my honesty, my willingness to accept the warning, and my overall history as a player.

Let me explain exactly what happened. A friend and I were planning to go to the Oil Rig. Before heading out, we even announced our plans in world chat. When we arrived at the first Large Oil Rig, there were two helicopters on the helipad. After landing and taking care of the scientists, we moved the two helicopters from the helipad and parked them below. We then planted C4 to take down the Chinook. After that, we headed to the second Large Oil Rig. When we arrived, we noticed around eight helicopters parked on the helipad landing areas. We immediately informed the admins through world chat and asked if they could remove them. However, the admin who responded said they weren't online and couldn't do anything about it. We then asked whether we could clear the landing area by moving the helicopters downstairs and parking them below. The response was that we shouldn't touch other people's belongings. Now, here's where my concern comes in. Nobody in world chat had claimed those helicopters or said they were coming back for them. Usually, when players leave helicopters at the Oil Rig, it's because they have failed the event or simply abandoned them. We even repeatedly asked in world chat if any of those helicopters belonged to someone and told people to come and collect them because we were planning to bomb the Chinook. However, nobody responded. In the end, we decided not to plant the C4. We simply inserted the red card and waited for the Chinook to arrive. When it did, it ended up destroying most of the helicopters parked at the Oil Rig. After that, Blue started accusing us of deliberately destroying other people's property. My concern is that this situation seems to be connected to an issue between Blue and me that started around nine months ago. For example, if someone mentions in world chat that another player has left items in a recycler, Blue might simply say that the person can keep them because they were left there. However, if I were to say the exact same thing, her response would be different, telling me not to touch other people's belongings and that there are other recyclers available. This is just one example of why I feel I'm being treated differently. Throughout my one and a half years of playing on the AU server, I have never intentionally stolen anyone's belongings or knowingly broken the server rules. Yet, ever since the incident between Blue and me, I feel like I'm constantly being watched, questioned, and accused of doing something wrong. Is this really fair? Am I not entitled to the same treatment as every other player? I'm not asking anyone to take my side blindly. All I'm asking is for someone to look at the evidence, hear my side of the story, and judge the situation fairly. And honestly, Blue, if apologising is what it takes to put this nine-month-old issue behind us, then I'm willing to apologise. I don't want to keep carrying this tension every time I log in to play. I just want to enjoy the game like everyone else without feeling that someone is constantly looking for a reason to get me kicked or banned. once again I have already attached screenshots showing the number of helicopters parked at the Oil Rig, as well as screenshots of our conversation with the admins. These screenshots provide context about what happened and show that we tried to handle the situation properly before proceeding. I kindly ask that they be reviewed before any decision is made. I hope someone can look into this matter objectively and give me a fair opportunity to defend myself.