siggesatan

no, nooo, nope, nay! to even sugest such thing i remember when for some reason a server had disabled its PVP protection for some reason. it turned ugly pretty fast. despite admins urges not to kill eachother it turned in to a warzone with in seconds. that day i died 5 times within 10 seconds. so as they say in Sweden "nej" thats not a good idea IMO

CanadianBaconism take your ban like a champ! you want public opinion. okay. shall we start from the bottom and up? 15:28 your not stating facts. you making a statment on subjective hubris as the folowing will circumstantial prove objectivly! 15:27 WoW i guess your not a fan of World of Warcraft. its okay NP the second message15:26 i belive this may be what is the last post in this log: refere to. as you your self stated you didnt recive a warning but instead got a kick. on that mater the Warned/kicked is either of one choises who knows if Admin Michael had an autogenerated choise to klick that just say "Warning/kick" well he clearly stated this was a kick! witch lated reformed in to a ban. and not even a permban... tough you had a neat little collection on your offencive list! well back to the list. i just repost the link so you guys dont need to scroll up! ♥ the first message 15:26 first of all here i do intend to objectivly take you in defence CanadianBaconism. the word luftwaffe literarly translate from German to english in to Airforce. even of today. Germany (that have to be the most anti Nazi country in the world still use the word) so the word it self isnt a nazi one. no the only mistake i belive you might have done was making a hint that Chloe was a Nazi not even a minute after posting Luftwaffer (airwaffles, yeah you spelled that one wrong ) i belive you do understand how that maylook to others. 15:25 and when you wrote the "*off" well when you facing a independent administration (who like all authority, exercise interpetation right) even tough you didnt tell her to Fuck off... do i even need to continue here? personaly objectivly speaking you have only used passive agresion thrue subliminal sugestion. nothing more now we coming to the parts that you should be hold acounted for and for it severity i am surpriced you got 30 day instead of a perm ban! 15:24 sexist statment on private genital parts (well personaly i am unsure whither forskinn is something that can exist on women.) however if not making a genderbased coment on Chloe's also by doing that you might suges their gender being a man. also you mentioning Cloies private genitals in sush degrading therm as the helie would shoot it. its definently not only harrasment but sexual harrasment and as such a massive criminal offence! IMO 15:23 futher you impliment once a gain Chloe to a man as Smegma is something men have on women it is called Vaginal disscharge. still genderbased sexual harrasment is not okay! 15:18 sonce again and here you started good with caps all in on your keyboard... (dont ask how i know. but big broo might watching you joke aside) still it make it look wors than it might have been intended. however the last statment "2:28 I'm Juststating facts" isnt consistand to your first one sugesting "Chloe smell like Ahlete's foot" i give you an E for effort as i think you meant Athlete's foot still your facts is based on lies you dont know what Chole smell like and even less Chloe's foot! all in all thats 2 cases of harrasment and 2 cases of sexual harrasment IMO so you definently should own that 30 day ban unless the admin wish to try your case again! cause you might just earn a more severe punishment. last i checked sexual harrasment is penalty by perm ban! so Michael have been easy on you. there is a high chanse Death or anyone else definently would have issued a permban! you need to take this 30 days and contemplate on your missdeads as how you can become a better human in the future relations to people in your suroundings.

and another thing i am alittle curious about is who cleared the TC if a person get 3 day ban? why i wonder was cause i was tasked of instaling christmas lights in the building. but someone have been tinkering with the TC after cristiano was banned.

it does seem like the demography of the gramar could be interpeted in 2 ways. in one way one could interpeted that the Cristano intention to spread nudes as in adverticing by typing "we must spread your tasteful nudes" on the other way it simply could mean to spread them out on picture frames that was in a private building with tripple airlocks and no windows , meant as a precaution so no unwanted players may be subjekted to the pictures them self! as anyone can see the precausions indeed was taken with signs hinting on wiever discresion advicment. it use key locks that require key to enter to prevent acidently taping in the right code. something that speaks for and not against cristiano here! also the text could have, or probably should have been in private (team chat between Cristano and whoever's nudes that was. the other text where quote "want to see the fap shack" it misses the question mark so the sentence wasnt formed as a question at all if he meant to ask "do you want to see the fap shack?" it seem more like he said to someone, that he wanted to se theirs. just think the interpetation rights have been porly handled in the issue to invoke a ban even if it is only 3 days and it also heard rumors that he had been warned several times about this so it is intresting why there is no documented screenshots of that either. as i understand rules and i have spoken to several admins about it both on EU survival and Us survival. they all saind simelar. as long as they are prevented for public display and as long as it is not adverticed there isn't any rules for uploading this materials as long as it doesnt break any laws. however i do understand there could be seen as sublime suggestion toward something that could be interpeted as borderline advertisment.

yes i totaly agree with you. however the way you experience things may be very individual. subjectivley speaking i tought Alice was on his way to launch so me personaly just wanted to give him a TP opurtunity but i guess it all ended up in a missunderstanding. thats is however how i see on the whole situation. and it is not like Alice doesnt know us he have been playing with me for over 4 month

first of all we tried to leave launch once told our precent wasnt wanted or needed. and second ,80 hp on a mini is good to pick up with a salvage hammer and re-deploy it and the health is fixed. i do question the whole deal about we making bradley shoot at the mini since there are sam-sites that may or may not shoot where he landed! but the log can prove that if we acidently had destroyed that mini while runing for our lifes while brad shoot at us we had owed Alice a new mini. it is as simple as that

it seem the new looting leave much to be desired when this hapens and it freezes and mes up gameplay. i liked the old one much better!

hey i don't want to come out a the one did a wrong thing. i admit using the the workbench. and yeah i picked up the scraps since it wasn't my scraps. but then circumstances changed i asked you about the details in the mater that you came in flying on a mini so you where not even at outpost where you obviously forgot the scraps! my condolences! and instead of admitting on your part of the mistake you and 2 others starting to lash out on me i think terd and thief was one of the things you all accused me of. another thing is i don't know what internet stalking would help your case. or start acting out toward me. like my you tube channel or the content would have anything to do with this case that is just if not harassment it appear to be at least borderline harassment. also it kind of is internet stalking (when you seek out information for the purpose or ridicule another person) i still had some of the scraps on me as you guys chose to escalate this to the point that for every insult/harassment coming my way ,there was a little less of the scraps. i could have just thrown it on the ground and let it despawn or put it in the refinery. but it is easy to say what i could vs what i should have done since i follow a simple directive. any one leaving mats or items in monumental areas like workbench and such in outpost and leaving the area isn't entitled to the loot if it is picked up by other player. one of the admins own words not mine! as a matter of fact some even encourage me to not return loot on similar occasion when one was using the bagger 288 for 24 hr and was offline in the past. the only issue is that you couldn't CoOp with the fact you making the mistake and forgot about the scraps. so why why do you feel the need to project your mistakes on me? cause you clearly didn't want to get on my good side. the good me if being honest is like hey mistakes can be made here is the scraps. the bad side is when some one starting to accuse people on false grounds. is okay hope you learned a lesson that if you going to entitle your self being rude to other players that goes both ways. and sometimes it can even go to far! i only taped in to the channeling force of your hubris of entitlement and denied you what you think would be right but in fact only benefit you thru unjust means! continue the behavior only solidify my resolute in the mater. as some one said in the chat only because you can doesn't mean you should. it is true. in both how we all behaved against each other i can honestly say you and your buddies kind of motivated me to be what you accused me of. since someone indirect admit that i was in the rights not needing to return the scraps. if admins think otherwise then i have to gather 1600 scraps and return it to you or i will receive a ban penalty if the admins think i have behaved improperly! but returning the scraps ain't gonna happen until i receive a public apology for you 3 guys for harassing me! both when you jumped to the conclusion that i stole your scraps and i was a terd and a thief. bringing up features on a you tube channel that have nothing to do with Rust it is nothing short of alienation from you guys i told you it was probably better if you stooped talking if you couldn't approach the mater in a constructive way! your buddy's didn't exactly helped here either since you where not the one calling me a terd! i am above such slander knowing it was an act out of emotions well it is going to be interesting to see what decisions will be made by the staff! at this state it is no longer up to either me or you! and trust me they will find out more than what you trying to portray once they look thru the whole chat log so. this isn't only about you and me anymore it is about all that chose to interfere. something i rather not wanted for you guys sake ... you know cause i am a caring guy. and deep down everyone love me (even tough they wouldn't admit it) i even went so far to think perhaps we could do a scrap run together. but i wasn't even sure you would listen to that since i am a terd and a thief. as always you and the buddy's words not mine! you where all ganging up on me! but i tell you what i will help you in the case. me and admin can have a discussion on the matter. and we discus from your point of view whether i am at wrong here. i am a man of my word! and if they think your in the right i can give you back all the scraps i currently have. unless i am banned already. it would be hard for me to do anything if that would be the case.

this bradly?

yeah sorry to say this China you used to be a nice guy but when you dominating Heli under presumption that every one can join you include everyone but Ken cause you have personal issue with him. US admin Crimgirl did the exact thing to him regarding the Bradley and when he questioned admin using the same bully mentality you obviously use he got banned for it! i must tell i totally lost the respect when you called him a Gook and refereed to him as toxic. i almost was about to pop you at outpost when you started to behave like a total douche to me (Joke or not you need to fix your shit Chinaski ) i am glad i didn't otherwise the outpost turrets probably had killed us both. you used to be fun to play with what the fuck happened to you China? Ken isn't the one being toxic you are!